Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386 (2004)
Standard views on surrogate decision making present alternative ideal models of what ideal surrogates should consider in rendering a decision. They do not, however, explain the physician''s responsibility to a patient who lacks decisional capacity or how a physician should regard surrogates and surrogate decisions. The authors argue that it is critical to recognize the moral difference between a patient''s decisions and a surrogate''s and the professional responsibilities implied by that distinction. In every case involving a patient who lacks decisional capacity, physicians and the treatment team have to make judgments about the appropriateness of both the surrogate and the surrogate''s decision. They have to assess the surrogate''s decisional capacity and attitude toward the patient as well as the reasons that support the surrogate''s decision. This paper provides a model for acceptable surrogate decisions and a standard for blocking inappropriate surrogates. Only decisions based on widely shared reasons are allowable for surrogate refusal of highly beneficial treatment.
|Keywords||assessment autonomy best interest decisional capacity decisions fiduciary responsibility professional responsibility reasonable person reasons substituted judgment surrogate|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decisionmaking.Allen E. Buchanan - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness.L. M. Kopelman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289.
Informed Consent Legal Theory and Clinical Practice.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Alan Meisel - 1987
Citations of this work BETA
Laying Futility to Rest.Michael Nair-Collins - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (5):554-583.
Overriding Parents’ Medical Decisions for Their Children: A Systematic Review of Normative Literature.Rosalind Mcdougall & Lauren Notini - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):448-452.
Similar books and articles
Enhancing Autonomy in Paid Surrogacy.Jennifer Damelio & Kelly Sorensen - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):269–277.
Substituted Judgment, Best Interests, and the Need for Best Respect.Susan R. Martyn - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (2):195.
Patient Autonomy, Assessment of Competence and Surrogate Decision-Making: A Call for Reasonableness in Deciding for Others.Kristine Bærøe - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Possible Limits to the Surrogate's Role: When a Patient Lacks Decisionmaking Capacity, Is the Surrogate's Role Absolute?Paul B. Hofmann - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):96-96.
"Through Her I Too Shall Bear a Child": Birth Surrogates in Jewish Law.Elie Spitz - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):65-97.
Counterfactual Reasoning in Surrogate Decision Making – Another Look.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (5):244-249.
Turning Failures Into Successes: A Methodological Shortcoming in Empirical Research on Surrogate Accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
The Substituted Judgment Standard. Studies on the Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Linus Broström - unknown
Dementia and Dignity: Towards a New Method of Surrogate Decision Making.Elysa R. Koppelman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #82,640 of 2,163,646 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,897 of 2,163,646 )
How can I increase my downloads?