Cognitive Science 34 (8):1561-1573 (2010)
The present studies tested the hypothesis that strong assumptions about within-category homogeneity impede children’s recognition of the inductive value of diverse samples of evidence. In Study 1a, children (7-year-olds) and adults were randomly assigned to receive a prime emphasizing within-category variability, a prime emphasizing within-category similarities, or to not receive a prime. Only following the variability prime, children demonstrated a reliable preference for evaluating diverse over nondiverse samples to determine whether there is support for a category-wide generalization. Adults demonstrated a robust preference for diverse samples in all conditions. These effects extended beyond the specific categories included in the prime, as well as to multiple types of test questions. Study 1b demonstrated that priming variability leads children to select diverse samples only when doing so is informative for induction. Implications for conceptual development are discussed
|Keywords||Sampling Induction Variability Conceptual development Natural kinds Categories|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Categories and Induction in Young Children.Susan A. Gelman & Ellen M. Markman - 1986 - Cognition 23 (3):183-209.
Statistical Inference and Sensitivity to Sampling in 11-Month-Old Infants.Fei Xu & Stephanie Denison - 2009 - Cognition 112 (1):97-104.
Differences in Preschoolers’ and Adults’ Use of Generics About Novel Animals and Artifacts: A Window Onto a Conceptual Divide.Amanda C. Brandone & Susan A. Gelman - 2009 - Cognition 110 (1):1-22.
Sample Diversity and Premise Typicality in Inductive Reasoning: Evidence for Developmental Change.Marjorie Rhodes, Daniel Brickman & Susan A. Gelman - 2008 - Cognition 108 (2):543-556.
Expertise and Category-Based Induction.Julia Beth Proffitt, John Coley, Medin D. & L. Douglas - 2000 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 26:811-828.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laypeople Do Use Sample Variance: The Effect of Embedding Data in a Variance-Implying Story.Natalie A. Obrecht, Gretchen B. Chapman & Marta T. Suárez - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):26 – 44.
Laypeople Do Use Sample Variance: The Effect of Embedding Data in a Variance-Implying Story.Marta T. Suárez, Gretchen B. Chapman & Natalie A. Obrecht - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):26-44.
Afterlife Beliefs: Category Specificity and Sensitivity to Biological Priming.Judith Bek & Suzanne Lock - 2011 - Religion, Brain and Behavior 1 (1):5-17.
Defining 'Ontological Category'.Jan Westerhoff - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):287–293.
Sheaves Over Heyting Lattices.Andrzej W. Jankowski & Marek Zawadowski - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (3):237 - 256.
Properties of the Diversity Effect in Category-Based Inductive Reasoning.Aidan Feeney & Evan Heit - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (2):156 - 181.
Natural Epistemology or Evolved Metaphysics? Developmental Evidence for Early-Developed, Intuitive, Category-Specific, Incomplete, and Stubborn Metaphysical Presumptions.Pascal Boyer - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (3):277 – 297.
Colour is a Culturalist Category.J. van Brakel - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):507-508.
The Law of Large Numbers in Children's Diversity-Based Reasoning.Gedeon Deák, Hong Li, Yiyuan Li, Bihua Cao & Fuhong Li - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 15 (4):388-404.
Is Category Specificity in the World or in the Mind?H. Clark Barrett - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):478-479.
Added to index2010-09-28
Total downloads13 ( #353,353 of 2,169,086 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,851 of 2,169,086 )
How can I increase my downloads?