Behavior and Philosophy 28 (1/2):41 - 55 (2000)
AbstractThe concept of rule-governed behavior is often used in the analysis of problem solving, conceptualization, and thinking. Rule-governed behavior has been described as behavior that is controlled by verbally constructed and transmitted discriminative stimuli. Instructions, advice, and examples are typical instances of rules that govern behavior during acquisition in problem solving situations. Nevertheless, some problems arise in identifying instructions with rules and instructionally-controlled behavior with rule-governed behavior. In this article, I argue that instructions, as instances of constructed discriminative stimuli, are the outcome of abstract stimulus control in humans. Descriptions of contingencies and performance may result from effective performance under abstract stimulus control. Instructions, as stimulus conditions, do not necessarily reproduce the abstract contingencies under which they were constructed. Therefore, instructions and self-instructions do not control abstract behavior. Instructions shape up new effective behavior by prompting and restricting response variation. A conceptual analysis along these arguments suggests that the usefulness of the distinction between rule-governed and contingency-shaped behaviors is questionable.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1950 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (4):328-332.
Science and human behavior.B. F. Skinner - 1954 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 144:268-269.
Citations of this work
Stepping Up to the Challenge of Complex Human Behavior: A Response to Ribes-Iñesta's Response.Denis O. Hora & Dermot Barnes-Holmes - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:59-60.
About Persistent Conceptual Confusion: Aresponse to O'Hora and Barnes-Holmes.Investigaciones en Comportamiento - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:27-29.
Similar books and articles
The Referential Nature of Rules and Instructions: A Response to Instructions, Rules, and Abstraction: A Misconstrued Relation by Emilio Ribes-Iñesta.Denis O'Hora & Dermot Barnes-Holmes - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:21 - 25.
Skinner's Distinction Between Rule-Governed and Contingency-Shaped Behaviour.Ullin T. Place - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):225 – 234.
The Effect of Instructions and Information Retrieval on Accepting the Premises in a Conditional Reasoning Task.Isabelle Vadeboncoeur & Henry Markovits - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (2):97 – 113.
Submission Instructions for  Biological Explanations of Behavior: Philosophical Perspectives (Hannover, Germany; 12-15 June, 2008). [REVIEW]Submission Instructions - unknown
Rule-Following, Explanation-Transcendence, and Private Language.Cyrus Panjvani - 2008 - Mind 117 (466):303-328.
Deductive and Inductive Conditional Inferences: Two Modes of Reasoning.Henrik Singmann & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (3):247 - 281.
Vicarious Agency: Experiencing Control Over the Movements of Others.Daniel M. Wegner & Betsy Sparrow - unknown
Antirealist Arguments in Behavior Analysis.François Tonneau - 2005 - Behavior and Philosophy 33:55 - 65.
Developmental Changes in Probabilistic Reasoning: The Role of Cognitive Capacity, Instructions, Thinking Styles and Relevant Knowledge.Francesca Chiesi, Caterina Primi & Kinga Morsanyi - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (3):315 - 350.
Behavior Is Abstraction, Not Ostension: Conceptual and Historical Remarks on the Nature of Psychology.Emilio Ribes-Iñesta - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):55 - 68.