Henrique Jales Ribeiro (ed.)
AbstractThe present volume assembles a relevant set of studies of argument by analogy, which address this topic in a systematic fashion, either from an essentially theoretical perspective or from the perspective of it being applied to different fields like politics, linguistics, literature, law, medicine, science in general and philosophy. All result from original research conducted by their authors for this publication. Thus, broadly speaking, this is an exception which we find worthy of occupying a special place in the sphere of the bibliography on the argument by analogy. In effect, most of the contexts of the publications on this topic focus on specific areas, for example everyday discourse, science or law theory, while underestimating or sometimes even ignoring other interdisciplinary scopes, as is the case of literature, medicine or philosophy. The idiosyncrasy of this volume is that the reader and the researcher may follow the development of different theoretical outlooks on argument by analogy, while measuring the scope of its application to the aforementioned areas as a whole.
Similar books and articles
Legal Progress Through Pragma-Dialectics? Prospects Beyond Analogy and E Contrario.Hendrik Kaptein - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):497-507.
Talk About God, and Others: (Approaches to Likeness in Certain Western Theological and Philosophical Systems): A Process Metaphysics of Analogy Introduced Historically: (By Way of Regard Especially to Attempted Syntheses of Bible and Hellenism).Eliyahu White - 1999 - [S.N.].
Just what is wrong with the argument from analogy?Don Locke - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):153-56.
The argument from analogy is not an argument for other mnds.Richard I. Sikora - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2):137-41.
Argument. Appreciation! Argument-Criticism: The "Aesthetics" of Informal Logic.Joel Rudinow - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
Abortion, Analogies and the Emergence of Value.Paul F. Camenisch - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (1):131 - 158.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Christopher Tindale - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):221-243.
The parent analogy: a reassessment.Jonathan Rutledge - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (1):5-14.
The Argument Form "Appeal to Galileo": A Critical Appreciation of Doury’s Account.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (3):221-272.
References found in this work
No references found.