The Theistic Argument from Beauty: A Philonian Critique

Brian Ribeiro
University of Tennessee, Chattanooga
In this paper I consider an understudied form of the design argument which focuses on the beauty of the natural world and which argues, on that basis, that the world requires a divine Artist in order to explain its beauty. Against this view, one might raise a question concerning the beauty of, and in, this divine Artist. What explains the divine beauty? This kind of explanatory regress objection is exactly like that used by Philo in Hume’s Dialogues to undercut standard versions of the design argument focused on the orderliness of the world. Here I argue that Philo’s explanatory regress objection likewise significantly undercuts versions of the design argument focusing on the beauty of the world.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.v5i3.224
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.David Hume & Nelson Pike - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (2):237-238.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
82 ( #91,970 of 2,237,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #10,964 of 2,237,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature