Direct reference and ascriptions of belief

Journal of Philosophical Logic 12 (4):425--52 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Direct Reference in Thought and Speech.Kirk A. Ludwig - 1993 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 26 (1):49-76.
A Simple Solution to the Problem of De Se Belief Ascriptions.Ari Maunu - 2000 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 33 (3-4):199-226.
Substitution and the Explanation of Action.Joan Bryans - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):365 - 376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
141 (#87,327)

6 months
2 (#275,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Richard
Harvard University

Citations of this work

The Broadest Necessity.Andrew Bacon - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (5):733-783.
Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content.Jeffrey C. King & Jason Stanley - 2005 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. pp. 111--164.
Do Demonstratives Have Senses?Richard Heck - 2002 - Philosophers' Imprint 2:1-33.
Modality and Meaning.William G. Lycan - 1994 - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

View all 60 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Attitudes de Dicto and de Se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
On the Logic of Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):81 - 98.
Belief and Acceptance.John Perry - 1980 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):533-542.
Tense, Propositions, and Meanings.Mark Richard - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 41 (3):337--351.

Add more references