Ernst Haeckel’s Alleged Anti-Semitism and Contributions to Nazi Biology
Biological Theory 2 (1):97-103 (2007)
Abstract
Ernst Haeckel’s popular book Nat¨urliche Sch¨opfungs- geschichte (Natural history of creation, 1868) represents human species in a hierarchy, from lowest (Papuan and Hottentot) to highest (Caucasian, including the Indo-German and Semitic races). His stem-tree (see Figure 1) of human descent and the racial theories that accompany it have been the focus of several recent books—histories arguing that Haeckel had a unique position in the rise of Nazi biology during the first part of the 20th century. In 1971, Daniel Gasman brought the initial bill of particulars; he portrayed Haeckel as having specific responsibility for Nazi racial programs. He argued that Darwin’s champion had a distinctive authority at the end of the 19th century, throwing into the shadows the myriads of others with similar racial attitudes.1 But it was not simply a general racism that Haeckel expressed; he was, according to Gasman (1971: 157–159), a virulent anti-Semite. Since its original publication, Gasman’s thesis has caught on with a large number of historians, so that in the present period it is usually taken as a truism, an obvious fact of the sordid history of biological thought in the first half of the 20th century.2 Perhaps the most prominent scholar—at least among historians of biology—to adopt and advance Gasman’s contention was Stephen Jay Gould. In his first book, Ontogeny and Phy- logeny (1977), Gould took as his subject Haeckel’s principle of recapitulation, the proposal that during ontogeny the developing embryo went through the same morphological stages as the phylum passed through in its evolutionary descent. So according to this conception, the human embryo begins as a one-celled creature, then takes on the form of an ancient invertebrate (e.g., a gastraea), then of a primitive vertebrate, then of an early mammal, then of a primate, and finally of a distinct..Author's Profile
DOI
10.1162/biot.2007.2.1.97
My notes
Similar books and articles
Haeckel’s embryos: fraud not proven.Robert J. Richards - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):147-154.
The Foundation of Ernst Haeckel's Evolutionary Project in Morphology, Aesthetics, and Tragedy.Robert J. Richards - unknown
Haeckel's Theory of the Unity of Nature: A Monograph in the History of Philosophy.David H. DeGrood - 1965 - Boston: Christopher Pub. House.
The Scientific Origins of National Socialism: Social Darwinism in Ernst Haeckel and the German Monist League.Daniel Gasman - 1971 - New York: American Elsevier.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
97 (#129,275)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2009-01-28
Downloads
97 (#129,275)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Biological Discourses on Human Races and Scientific Racism in Brazil.Juanma Sánchez Arteaga - 2017 - Journal of the History of Biology 50 (2):267-314.
References found in this work
The Nazi doctors: medical killing and the psychology of genocide.Robert Jay Lifton - 2017 - New York: Basic Books.
Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior.Daniel C. Dennett - 1989 - Journal of the History of Biology 22 (2):361-367.
Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior.Daniel C. Dennett - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):540-543.