E pluribus unum: A defense of Davidson's individuation of action

Philosophical Studies 29 (3):191 - 198 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00373155

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Two dogmas of contemporary philosophy of action.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):10-24.
E pluribus unum? A new take on addiction by Redish et al.Thomas Stalnaker & Geoffrey Schoenbaum - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):459-459.
E Pluribus Unum: Arguments against Conceptual Schemes and Empirical Content.Nathaniel Goldberg - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):411-438.
E pluribus unum?Daniel C. Dennett - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):617-618.
Action-Individuation and Doxastic Agency.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2011 - Theoria 77 (4):312-332.
Anomalism, supervenience, and Davidson on content-individuation.Mark Rowlands - 1990 - Philosophia 20 (3):295-310.
Essays on Davidson: actions and events.Bruce Vermazen & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.) - 1985 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Action individuation: a normative functionalist approach.Chauncey Maher - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (1):99-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#323,378)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Norvin Richards
University of Alabama

Citations of this work

The divisibility of basic actions.Kevin Lynch - 2017 - Analysis 77 (2):312-318.
Individuating Actions: The Fine—Grained Approach.Hugh J. McCann - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):493 - 512.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references