Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):256-270 (2008)

Abstract
Recent work on incidental fndings, concentrating on the difcult problems posed by the ambiguous results often generated by high-tech medicine, has proceeded largely independently from recent work on medical researchers' ancillary-care obligations, the obligations that researchers have to deal with diseases or conditions besides the one(s) under study. This paper contends that the two topics are morally linked, and specifcally that a sound understanding of ancillary-care obligations will center them on incidental fndings. The paper sets out and defends an understanding of ancillary-care obligations, which is based on the idea that when participants signed up for a study they may — independently of their beliefs and expectations and of those of the researchers — be taken to have partially entrusted certain aspects of their health into the researchers' hands. This partial-entrustment model of ancillary-care obligations, in turn, has substantive implications for how to deal ethically with incidental fndings; for instance, it suggests that researchers have no moral obligation to hunt for incidental fndings.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00268.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,141
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Scope of Moral Requirement.Barbara Herman - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3):227-256.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
'Role' as a Moral Concept in Health Care.N. E. Bowie - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):57-64.
Collateral Damage and the Principle of Due Care.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2014 - Journal of Military Ethics 13 (1):94-105.
Ancillary Care Duties: The Demands of Justice.C. R. Hooper - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):708-711.
Genomic Research and Incidental Findings.Brian Van Ness - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):292-297.
The Future of Incidental Findings: Should They Be Viewed as Benefits?Lisa S. Parker - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):341-351.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-31

Total views
33 ( #309,668 of 2,404,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,039 of 2,404,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes