Interdisciplinary modeling: a case study of evolutionary economics

Biology and Philosophy 26 (5):655-675 (2011)
Biologists and economists use models to study complex systems. This similarity between these disciplines has led to an interesting development: the borrowing of various components of model-based theorizing between the two domains. A major recent example of this strategy is economists’ utilization of the resources of evolutionary biology in order to construct models of economic systems. This general strategy has come to be called evolutionary economics and has been a source of much debate among economists. Although philosophers have developed literatures on the nature of models and modeling, the unique issues surrounding this kind of interdisciplinary model building have yet to be independently investigated. In this paper, we utilize evolutionary economics as a case study in the investigation of more general issues concerning interdisciplinary modeling. We begin by critiquing the distinctions currently used within the evolutionary economics literature and propose an alternative carving of the conceptual terrain. We then argue that the three types of evolutionary economics we distinguish capture distinctions that will be important whenever resources of model-based theorizing are borrowed across distinct scientific domains. Our analysis of these model-building strategies identifies several of the unique methodological and philosophical issues that confront interdisciplinary modeling
Keywords Philosophy   Evolutionary Biology   Philosophy of Biology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-011-9274-2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,793
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.Daniel C. Dennett & Jon Hodge - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.
The Strategy of Model-Based Science.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):725-740.
Three Kinds of Idealization.Michael Weisberg - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (12):639-659.
Who is a Modeler?M. Weisberg - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):207-233.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Models on the Move: Migration and Imperialism.Seamus Bradley & Karim P. Y. Thébault - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Strategies of Model Building in Population Genetics.Anya Plutynski - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):755-764.
Beyond the Hype.A. W. Schulz - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):46-72.
Androids and Agents: Do We Need a Non‐Computational Economics?Wolfram Latsch - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):375-396.
Evolutionary Realism: A New Ontology for Economics.Kurt Dopfer & Jason Potts - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (2):195-212.
Evolutionary Economics: In Defence of 'Vagueness'.Matthias Klaes - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):359-376.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
Models of Man: Neoclassical, Behavioural, and Evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
30 ( #189,288 of 2,214,705 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,895 of 2,214,705 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature