Perspectives on Science 10 (1):1-27 (2002)
: According to Kuhn, theory choice is not governed by algorithms, but by values, which influence yet do not determine theory choice. Cladistic hypotheses, however, seem to be evaluated relative to a parsimony algorithm, which asserts that the best phylogenetic hypothesis is the one that requires the fewest character changes. While this seems to be an unequivocal evaluative rule, it is not. The application of the parsimony principle is ultimately indeterminate because the choice and individuation of characters that figure in parsimony computations are indeterminate. The cladistic approach is Kuhnian because the application of parsimony depends on persuasion, background, training and tradition
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Biological Classification: Toward a Synthesis of Opposing Methodologies.Ernst Mayr - 1994 - In E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 510--277.
Citations of this work BETA
The Poverty of Taxonomic Characters.Olivier Rieppel & Maureen Kearney - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):95-113.
Similar books and articles
Quantitative Parsimony.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):329-343.
Reconstructing the Character States of Ancestors: A Likelihood Perspective on Cladistic Parsimony.Elliott Sober - 2002 - The Monist 85 (1):156 - 176.
Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference.Richard Richards - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (2):264-279.
Outline of an Explanatory Account of Cladistic Practice.Nico M. Franz - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):489-515.
Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Principle of the Common Cause.Elliott Sober - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):465-469.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #80,651 of 2,168,936 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,936 )
How can I increase my downloads?