University of Chicago Press (2004)
Why do major historical events such as the Holocaust occupy the forefront of the collective consciousness, while profound moments such as the Armenian genocide, the McCarthy era, and France's role in North Africa stand distantly behind? Is it possible that history "overly remembers" some events at the expense of others? A landmark work in philosophy, Paul Ricoeur's Memory, History, Forgetting examines this reciprocal relationship between remembering and forgetting, showing how it affects both the perception of historical experience and the production of historical narrative. Memory, History, Forgetting , like its title, is divided into three major sections. Ricoeur first takes a phenomenological approach to memory and mnemonical devices. The underlying question here is how a memory of present can be of something absent, the past. The second section addresses recent work by historians by reopening the question of the nature and truth of historical knowledge. Ricoeur explores whether historians, who can write a history of memory, can truly break with all dependence on memory, including memories that resist representation. The third and final section is a profound meditation on the necessity of forgetting as a condition for the possibility of remembering, and whether there can be something like happy forgetting in parallel to happy memory. Throughout the book there are careful and close readings of the texts of Aristotle and Plato, of Descartes and Kant, and of Halbwachs and Pierre Nora. A momentous achievement in the career of one of the most significant philosophers of our age, Memory, History, Forgetting provides the crucial link between Ricoeur's Time and Narrative and Oneself as Another and his recent reflections on ethics and the problems of responsibility and representation.
|Keywords||Memory (Philosophy History Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$21.00 used (48% off) $34.45 direct from Amazon (14% off) $69.95 new Amazon page|
|Call number||B2430.R553.M4613 2004|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
What Does (Not) Count as Violence: On the State of Recent Debates About the Inner Connection Between Language and Violence. [REVIEW]Burkhard Liebsch - 2013 - Human Studies 36 (1):7-24.
What Does (Not) "Count" as Violence: On the State of Recent Debates About the Inner Connection Between Language and Violence. [REVIEW]Burkhard Liebsch - 2013 - Human Studies 36 (1):7 - 24.
Similar books and articles
Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory.Andreas Huyssen - 2003 - Stanford University Press.
Is Forgetting Reprehensible? Holocaust Remembrance and the Task of Oblivion.Björn Krondorfer - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):233-267.
The Touch of the Past: Remembrance, Learning, and Ethics.Roger I. Simon - 2005 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Nature of Forgetting From Short-Term Memory.Paul Muter - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):134-134.
History, Memory, and Forgetting in Nietzsche and Derrida.Michael Marder - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):137-157.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #61,578 of 2,132,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #98,975 of 2,132,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.