Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):212-219 (2010)

Abstract
The debate about embryonic stem cell research is a conflict not between “religion” and “science,” but between two ethical approaches to the dignity of human beings. The newer, more pragmatic ethic is not necessarily more conducive to rapid medical progress as is often assumed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00481.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.
Law, Science, and Innovation: Introduction to the Symposium.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy?William M. Sage - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Evaluation of Policy Options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-11

Total views
50 ( #215,329 of 2,454,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,233 of 2,454,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes