Authors |
|
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1086/664596 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Whence Philosophy of Biology?Jason M. Byron - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):409-422.
Planning Science: Otto Neurath and the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.George A. Reisch - 1994 - British Journal for the History of Science 27 (2):153-175.
Citations of this work BETA
The Institutional Stabilization of Philosophy of Science and its Withdrawal From Social Concerns After the Second World War.Fons Dewulf - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (5):935-953.
Kuhn, Pedagogy, and Practice: A Local Reading of Structure.Lydia Patton - 2018 - In Moti Mizrahi (ed.), The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Philipp Frank’s Decline and the Crisis of Logical Empiricism.Adam Tamas Tuboly - 2017 - Studies in East European Thought 69 (3):257-276.
Hans Reichenbach, Radio Philosopher: A Preliminary Report.Alan W. Richardson - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12625-12641.
Similar books and articles
"Condemned to Footnotes": Marxist Scholarship in the History of Science.Russell Olwell - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (1):7 - 26.
Making British Cortisone: Glaxo and the Development of Corticosteroids in Britain in the 1950s–1960s.Viviane Quirke - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):645-674.
Pt. 1: General Reflections. Thomas Kuhn and Interdisciplinary Conversation : Why Historians and Philosophers of Science Stopped Talking to One Another / Jan Golinski ; The History and Philosophy of Science History / David Marshall Miller ; What in Truth Divides Historians and Philosophers of Science? / Kenneth L. Caneva ; History and Philosophy of Science : Thirty-Five Years Later / Ronald N. Giere ; Philosophy of Science and its Historical Reconstruction / Peter Dear ; The Underdetermination Debate : How Lack of History Leads to Bad Philosophy. [REVIEW]Wolfgang Pietsch - 2011 - In Seymour H. Mauskopf & Tad M. Schmaltz (eds.), Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects. Springer Verlag.
John Dewey’s Logic of Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):258-306.
More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481.
Prescription Versus Description in Philosophy of Science, or Methodology Versus History: A Critical Assessment.Nader Chokr - 1986 - Metaphilosophy 17 (4):289-299.
A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy.John F. W. Herschel - 1830 - University of Chicago Press.
Engagement for Progress: Applied Philosophy of Science in Context.Heather E. Douglas - 2010 - Synthese 177 (3):317-335.
The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science.Rachel Laudan - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-26
Total views
212,459 ( #2 of 2,507,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #81,130 of 2,507,562 )
2014-01-26
Total views
212,459 ( #2 of 2,507,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #81,130 of 2,507,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads