Public Health Doctors' Ancillary-Care Obligations

Public Health Ethics 3 (1):63-67 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This comment on the case presented in ‘Cholera and Nothing More’ argues that the physicians at this public-health centre did not have an ordinary clinician's obligations to promote the health of the people who came to them for care, as they were instead set up to serve a laudable and urgent public-health goal, namely, controlling a cholera outbreak. It argues that, nonetheless, these physicians did have some limited moral duties to care for other diseases they encountered—some ancillary-care duties—arising from their voluntarily entering into a kind of intimate relationship with the patients they took in, one in which those patients effectively waive certain rights to bodily and medical privacy



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Community, Public Health and Resource Allocation.T. M. Wilkinson - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (3):267-271.
'Role' as a moral concept in health care.N. E. Bowie - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):57-64.
Equity and public health care in china.Ren-Zong Qiu - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):283-287.
From Health Care Reform to Public Health Reform.Micah L. Berman - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):328-339.
Patients' duties.Michael J. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.


Added to PP

269 (#76,184)

6 months
17 (#151,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Henry S. Richardson
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations