Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):285 – 307 (2000)
Abstract
The notion that it is useful to specify norms progressively in order to resolve doubts about what to do, which I developed initially in a 1990 article, has been only partly assimilated by the bioethics literature. The thought is not just that it is helpful to work with relatively specific norms. It is more than that: specification can replace deductive subsumption and balancing. Here I argue against two versions of reliance on balancing that are prominent in recent bioethical discussions. Without meaning to address the substance or the overall merits of either view I criticize, I attack Gert, Culver and Clouser's implicit reliance on some overall dimension of balancing as a basis of resolving conflicts among norms and Beauchamp and Childress's residual acceptance of 'justified balancing'. The former authors' description of resolving conflicts depends upon a type of value commensurability that (as they otherwise seem to admit) does not obtain, while the latter authors' role for justified balancing would be better served by continued specification.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3;1-H;FT285
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Specifying Rights: The Case of TRIPS.G. Collste - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):63-69.
The Moral Contours of Empathy.Alisa L. Carse - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):169-195.
Internationalizing Professional Codes in Engineering.C. E. Harris - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):503-521.
Common Morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress.Oliver Rauprich - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

51 ( #101,785 of 2,163,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,660 of 2,163,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums