The development of arithmetic in Frege's Grundgesetze der Arithmetik

Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):579-601 (1993)
Abstract
Frege's development of the theory of arithmetic in his Grundgesetze der Arithmetik has long been ignored, since the formal theory of the Grundgesetze is inconsistent. His derivations of the axioms of arithmetic from what is known as Hume's Principle do not, however, depend upon that axiom of the system--Axiom V--which is responsible for the inconsistency. On the contrary, Frege's proofs constitute a derivation of axioms for arithmetic from Hume's Principle, in (axiomatic) second-order logic. Moreover, though Frege does prove each of the now standard Dedekind-Peano axioms, his proofs are devoted primarily to the derivation of his own axioms for arithmetic, which are somewhat different (though of course equivalent). These axioms, which may be yet more intuitive than the Dedekind-Peano axioms, may be taken to be "The Basic Laws of Cardinal Number", as Frege understood them. Though the axioms of arithmetic have been known to be derivable from Hume's Principle for about ten years now, it has not been widely recognized that Frege himself showed them so to be; nor has it been known that Frege made use of any axiomatization for arithmetic whatsoever. Grundgesetze is thus a work of much greater significance than has often been thought. First, Frege's use of the inconsistent Axiom V may invalidate certain of his claims regarding the philosophical significance of his work (viz., the establishment of Logicism), but it should not be allowed to obscure his mathematical accomplishments and his contribution to our understanding of arithmetic. Second, Frege's knowledge that arithmetic is derivable from Hume's Principle raises important sorts of questions about his philosophy of arithmetic. For example, "Why did Frege not simply abandon Axiom V and take Hume's Principle as an axiom?"
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2275220
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
On the Consistency of the First-Order Portion of Frege's Logical System.Terence Parsons - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1):161-168.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Comparing Peano Arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle.Sean Walsh - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.
Predicative Fragments of Frege Arithmetic.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):153-174.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Frege on Knowing the Foundation.Tyler Burge - 1998 - Mind 107 (426):305-347.
Frege's Theorem: An Introduction.Richard Heck - 1999 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 7 (1):56-73.
Predicative Fragments of Frege Arithmetic.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):153-174.
Finitude and Hume's Principle.Richard G. Heck Jr - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):589 - 617.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

51 ( #102,380 of 2,169,071 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #126,814 of 2,169,071 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums