Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):901-902 (2001)

Authors
Abstract
We commend the argument that perception and action are tightly coupled. We claim that the argument is not new, that uniting stimulus and response codes is not a problem for a cognitive system, only for psychologists who assume them, and that the Theory of Event Coding (TEC)'s event-codes are arbitrary and ungrounded. Affordances and information offer the common basis for perception-action (and even for event-codes).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x01440106
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Computational Motor Planning and the Theory of Event Coding.David A. Rosenbaum - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):902-903.
The Normative Force of Reasoning.Ralph Wedgwood - 2006 - Noûs 40 (4):660–686.
On the Everettian Epistemic Problem.Hilary Greaves - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):120-152.
Perception, Action Planning, and Cognitive Maps.Eric Chown, Lashon B. Booker & Stephen Kaplan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):882-882.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
37 ( #278,389 of 2,419,525 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,629 of 2,419,525 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes