The Scope of Aristotle's Essentialism in the Posterior Analytics

Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1):1-20 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle's essentialism is generally recognized as involving a distinction between what belongs to something _in itself (kath' hauto) and what belongs to it _accidentally (kata sumbebekos). But he distinguishes two relevant senses of "_in itself"; the first referring to what belongs to something in _what it is, the second referring to such attributes as: odd to number, male to animal, curved to line, and white to surface. I set out these distinctions, and argue that Aristotle counts the second class of _in itself attributes as being just as essential to the individual substances to which they belong as the first

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#141,007)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Metaphysics as the First Philosophy.Tuomas Tahko - 2013 - In Edward Feser (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 49-67.
Aristotle's Theory of Abstraction.Allan Bäck - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Laws of nature and natural laws.Daryn Lehoux - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):527-549.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references