The Scope of Aristotle's Essentialism in the Posterior Analytics

Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1):1-20 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle's essentialism is generally recognized as involving a distinction between what belongs to something _in itself (kath' hauto) and what belongs to it _accidentally (kata sumbebekos). But he distinguishes two relevant senses of "_in itself"; the first referring to what belongs to something in _what it is, the second referring to such attributes as: odd to number, male to animal, curved to line, and white to surface. I set out these distinctions, and argue that Aristotle counts the second class of _in itself attributes as being just as essential to the individual substances to which they belong as the first

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#184,902)

6 months
16 (#273,726)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Tierney
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Citations of this work

Aristotle's Theory of Abstraction.Allan Bäck - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Metaphysics as the First Philosophy.Tuomas Tahko - 2013 - In Edward Feser (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 49-67.
Laws of nature and natural laws.Daryn Lehoux - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):527-549.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references