What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism

Abstract
This paper rejects a view of science called "methodological naturalism." According to many defenders of mainstream science and Darwinian evolution, anti-evolution critics--creationists and intelligent design proponents--are conceptually and epistemologically confusing science and religion, a supernatural view of world. These defenders of evolution contend that doing science requires adhering to a methodology that is strictly and essentially naturalistic: science is essentially committed to "methodological naturalism" and assumes that all the phenomena it investigates are entirely natural and consistent with the laws of physics. Thus encountering any unexplained phenomenon, science assumes a priori that there is some natural cause and will only test a natural hypothesis. Since by definition supernatural causes are assumed to be not subject to the constraints of physical or natural law as understood by science, supernatural hypotheses and explanations must be banned from proper science. Science simply can't say that God did, or did not do it. I argue that the success of science is directly relevant to rational belief in supernatural causes, and that in fact science can and does say in particular cases that "God didn't do it." I suggest that pro-evolution proponents can better defend science and the theory of evolution by rejecting methodological naturalism.
Keywords methodological naturalism  creationism  intelligent design  science  naturalism  supernatural  evolution  anti-evolution
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,812
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Methodology of Augustinian Science.S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī - 2011 - Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.
Methodological Naturalism, Part 2.Alvin Plantinga - 1997 - Origins and Design 18 (2):22-34.
Creationism and Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2003 - Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 4:143-163.
The Pursuit of the Natural.Scott Tanona - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (1):79 - 87.
The Premodern Sins of Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 732-747.
Methodological Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 1997 - Origins and Design 18 (1):18-27.
Added to PP index
2011-10-23

Total downloads
8 ( #552,526 of 2,231,554 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,718 of 2,231,554 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature