Who you could have known: divine hiddenness, epistemic counterfactuals, and the recalcitrant nature of natural theology

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (3):337-348 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue there is a deep conflict in Paul Moser’s work on divine hiddenness. Moser’s treatment of DH adopts a thesis we call SEEK: DH often results from failing to seek God on His terms. One way in which people err, according to Moser, is by trusting arguments of traditional natural theology to lead to filial knowledge of God. We argue that Moser’s SEEK thesis commits him to the counterfactual ACCESS: had the atheist sought after God in harmony with how God reveals himself, she would have had access to filial knowledge of God. By failing to incorporate arguments or propositional evidence for God’s existence, Moser’s account leaves the doubting seeker without any evidential reason to think that either SEEK or ACCESS is true. Without this rational motivation in place, the doubting seeker is unlikely to seek after God in the way ACCESS describes. We argue that natural theology provides an evidential epistemic aid to motivate persons to seek God the way ACCESS describes. Thus, Moser is mistaken. Such arguments can be evidentially helpful in coming to know God. In conclusion, we explain how our reply naturally fits how we form and maintain trusting interpersonal relationships with others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hiddenness, evidence, and idolatry.E. J. Coffman & Jeff Cervantez - 2011 - In Raymond VanArragon & Kelly James Clark (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
The evidence for God: religious knowledge reexamined.Paul K. Moser - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Divine Hiddenness: New Essays.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Paul Moser - 2001 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Introduction: The Hiddenness of God.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Paul K. Moser - 2001 - In Daniel Howard-Snyder & Paul Moser (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
The elusive God: reorienting religious epistemology.Paul K. Moser - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Thomistic Response to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness.Travis Dumsday - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):365-377.
Incarnation and the Divine Hiddenness Debate.Hunter Brown - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (2):252-260.
Divine Hiddenness Does Not Justify Atheism.Paul Moser - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 42.
Divine hiddenness, death, and meaning.Paul K. Moser - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of religion: classic and contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
The Origin [and Demise] of [a] Species [of Natural Theology].David Schrader - 2004 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 7.
Another look at divine hiddenness.Terence Cuneo - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (2):151-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-26

Downloads
81 (#207,875)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Derek McAllister
Towson University
Brandon Rickabaugh
Palm Beach Atlantic University

Citations of this work

Natural Theology, Evidence, and Epistemic Humility.Trent Dougherty & Brandon Rickabaugh - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):19-42.
Access denied: a reply to Rickabaugh and McAllister.Christopher M. P. Tomaszewski & John W. Rosenbaum - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (2):201-207.

Add more citations