Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):363-369 (2005)
Linda Zagzebski has recently argued that there is a conflict between a common view of the asymmetry of time and various other metaphysical hypotheses. She identifies conflicts in the case of the modal arrow of time and in the case of the causal arrow of time. In the case of the modal arrow I argue that on one view there is no conflict and that on another the principle should be abandoned that there are entailments between propositions about the past and the future. In the case of the causal arrow I argue that the conflict can be avoided by the adoption of a suitable closure principle
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time.Étienne Klein - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):203-221.
Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Jos Uffink - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (3):305-394.
Time's Arrow and Irreversibility in Time-Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics.Mario Castagnino, Manuel Gadella & Olimpia Lombardi - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):223 – 243.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #243,020 of 2,154,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,226 of 2,154,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?