Anti-reductionism and supervenience

Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):330-348 (2007)
Authors
Michael Ridge
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that anti-reductionist moral realism still has trouble explaining supervenience. My main target here will be Russ Shafer-Landau's attempt to explain the supervenience of the moral on the natural in terms of the constitution of moral property instantiations by natural property instantiations. First, though, I discuss a recent challenge to the very idea of using supervenience as a dialectical weapon posed by Nicholas Sturgeon. With a suitably formulated supervenience thesis in hand, I try to show how Shafer-Landau's proffered strategy to explain supervenience not only fails to explain supervenience, but that it also has a number of implausible consequences. The more general lesson is that strategies which may work well for explaining supervenience in the philosophy of mind and other areas cannot be assumed to carry over successfully to the metaethical context. We should therefore treat so-called `companions in guilt' arguments in this area of philosophy with considerable skepticism. Key Words: expressivism • moral realism • non-naturalism • reductionism • supervenience • trope.
Keywords Moral Realism   Non-naturalism   Supervenience   Reductionism   Trope   Expressivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1740468107083248
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,581
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Grounding and the Argument From Explanatoriness.David Mark Kovacs - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):2927-2952.
The Myth of the Myth of Supervenience.David Mark Kovacs - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-23.
Moral Supervenience.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3-4):592-615.
Debunking Arguments From Insensitivity.Matthew Braddock - 2017 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7 (2):91-113.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Supervenience.R. M. Hare - 1984 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-16.
Psychophysical Supervenience, Dependency, and Reduction.Cynthia Macdonald - 1995 - In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press. pp. 140--57.
Davidson's Troubles with Supervenience.James C. Klagge - 1990 - Synthese 85 (November):339-52.
Explaining Supervenience.Nick Zagwill - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:509-518.
Varieties of Supervenience.Robert Stalnaker - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:221-42.
Varieties of Supervenience.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1995 - In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press. pp. 16--59.
Supervenience and Reductive Physicalism.Erhan Demircioglu - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (1):25-35.
Supervenience.Harold W. Noonan - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (January):78-85.
Supervenience Revisited.Simon W. Blackburn - 1984 - In Ian Hacking (ed.), Exercises in Analysis: Essays by Students of Casimir Lewy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 59--74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
246 ( #18,671 of 2,268,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #67,022 of 2,268,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature