Nietzsche on art and freedom

European Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):204–224 (2007)
There are passages in Nietzsche that can be read as contributions to the free will/determinism debate. When read in that way, they reveal a fairly amateurish metaphysician with little of real substance or novelty to contribute; and if these readings were apt or perspicuous, it seems to me, they would show that Nietzsche's thoughts about freedom were barely worth pausing over. They would simply confirm the impression—amply bolstered from other quarters—that Nietzsche was not at his best when addressing the staple questions of philosophy. But these readings sell Nietzsche short. He had next to no systematic interest in metaphysics, and his concern with the question of freedom was not motivated by metaphysical considerations. Rather—and as with all of Nietzsche's concerns—his motivations were ethical. He was interested, not in the relation of the human will to the causal order of nature, but in the relation between freedom and the good life, between the will and exemplary human living. Read from this perspective, Nietzsche's remarks about freedom actually add up to something. And what they add up to is one aspect of his attempt to understand life after the model of art. Beauty, for Kant, was an image of the moral.1 For Nietzsche, by contrast—and the contrast can be hard to spell out—art was an image of the ethical.2 My hope here is to begin to explain why Nietzsche might have thought that the issue of freedom was relevant to that. In sections 1–3, I attempt to show why Nietzsche is not best read as a participant in the standard free will/determinism debate; in sections 4–6, I try to spell out the ethical conception of freedom that he develops instead
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00259.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - Courier Dover Publications.
Mind, Value, and Reality.John Henry McDowell - 1998 - Harvard University Press.
Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action.Joseph Raz - 1999 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why Should We Care About Nietzsche's ‘Higher Men’?Omri Ben‐Zvi - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4).
VIII-Nietzsche,Amor FatiandThe Gay Science.Tom Stern - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (2pt2):145-162.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Freedom as a Philosophical Ideal: Nietzsche and His Antecedents.Donald Rutherford - 2011 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (5):512 - 540.
Nietzsche's Daybreak.Carl B. Sachs - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):81-100.
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Nietzsche on Art by Ridley, Aaron.Tom Meyer - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):426–428.
Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy (Review).Mark P. Jenkins - 2010 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 40 (1):85-90.
Nietzsche on Freedom.Robert Guay - 2002 - European Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):302–327.
Nietzsche's Intentions: What the Sovereign Individual Promises.Aaron Ridley - 2009 - In Ken Gemes & Simon May (eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford University Press. pp. 181--196.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

39 ( #133,022 of 2,171,994 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #76,319 of 2,171,994 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums