National Security as a Corporate Social Responsibility: Critical Infrastructure Resilience [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):111-125 (2011)
Abstract
This article argues for an extension to the scope of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research to include a contemporary issue of importance to national and global security, critical infrastructure resilience. Rather than extending the multiple perspectives on CSR, this study aimed to identify a method of recognising CSR-related issues, before applying it to two dissimilar case studies on critical infrastructure resilience. One case study was of an international telecommunications company based in the US while the other was of the railway network in Britain during a period of privatisation. The method used was derived from Okoye’s (J Bus Ethics 89(4):613–627, 2009 ) common reference core for CSR. Both case studies satisfied all the criteria sought which points to critical infrastructure resilience as being an emerging CSR issue. Because ongoing change characterises CSR, the method may have application for identifying future new CSR strands. As the findings suggest that some aspects of national and global security are CSR-related phenomena, the study demonstrates how CSR research may be significant at a societal, national and global level. Implications of the study include a broadening of the value and reach of contributions from CSR researchers and practitioners
Keywords British railway industry  case study  corporate social responsibility  critical infrastructure resilience  essentially contested concepts  Microsoft Corporation  national security
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0845-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,938
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Corporate Social Responsibility.Duane Windsor - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:180-185.
Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1955 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167 - 198.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Practicing the Business of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Perspective.Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117.
Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility.Rama B. Rao - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
An Organizing Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility Theories.Duane Windsor - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:151-162.
Corporate Social Responsibility.Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.
Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility.Edmund F. Byrne - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):201 - 217.
From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR.Vladimir Petkoski - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:283-295.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-08-26

Total downloads
15 ( #379,139 of 2,273,315 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #150,257 of 2,273,315 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature