Authors
Mark Rigstad
Oakland University
Abstract
Even if preventive military counter-terrorism may sometimes be ethically justifiable, it remains an open question whether the Bush Doctrine presented a discursively coherent account of the relevant normative conditions. With a view towards answering this question, this article critically examines efforts to ground the morally personifying language of the Bush Doctrine in term of hegemonic stability theory. Particular critical attention is paid to the arguments of leading proponents of this brand of game theory, including J. Yoo, E. Posner, A. Sykes, and J. Goldsmith. When examined in their terms, the Bush Doctine is best understood as an ethically hypocritical and shortsighted international discursive strategy. Its use of moralistic language in demonizing ‘rogue states’ for purely amoral purposes is normatively incoherent and discursively unsustainable. If it is a strategically rational piece of international communication, it seems designed to undermine globally shared normative meanings for the sake of short-term unilateral military advantage.
Keywords Bush Doctrine  Hegemony  Game Theory  Discourse Strategy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230903127895
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Motivated Irrationality.D. F. Pears & David Pugmire - 1982 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 56:157-196.
Preventive War.David Luban - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (3):207-248.
Institutionalizing the Just War.Allen Buchanan - 2006 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (1):2-38.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Deconstructing the ‘Yoshida Doctrine’.Hiroyuki Hoshiro - forthcoming - Japanese Journal of Political Science:1-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The 'Bush Doctrine' as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy.Mark Rigstad - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
American Social Sciences and the Bush Doctrine.Chao-wu Dai - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:1-9.
The epistemological status of the sustainability discourse.Alejandra Sampson - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 15:142-183.
The Epistemological Status of the Sustainability Discourse [Spanish].Alejandra Ojeda Sampson - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 15:142-183.
US Presidential Discourse, September 11-20, 2011: The Birth of the War on Terror.Alfred Fusman - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (34):126-151.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
12 ( #806,475 of 2,499,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes