Neuroethics 3 (1):5-12 (2010)
I will argue that the fairly common assumption that brain imaging may compromise people’s privacy in an undesirable way only if moral crimes are committed is false. Sometimes persons’ privacy is compromised because of failures of privacy. A normal emotional reaction to failures of privacy is embarrassment and shame, not moral resentment like in the cases of violations of right to privacy. I will claim that if (1) neuroimaging will provide all kinds of information about persons’ inner life and not only information that is intentionally searched for, and (2) there will be more and more application fields of fMRI and more and more people whose brains will be scanned (without any coercion), then, in the future, shame may be an unfortunately common feeling in our culture. This is because failures of privacy may dramatically increase. A person may feel shame strongly and long, especially if his failure is witnessed by people who he considers relatively important, but less than perfectly trustworthy.
|Keywords||Privacy Brain imaging Shame|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Imaging or Imagining? A Neuroethics Challenge Informed by Genetics.Judy Illes & Eric Racine - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):5 – 18.
Citations of this work BETA
The Neuroscience of Decision Making and Our Standards for Assessing Competence to Consent.Steve Clarke - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (1):189-196.
Perceived Access to Self-Relevant Information Mediates Judgments of Privacy Violations in Neuromonitoring and Other Monitoring Technologies.D. A. Baker, N. J. Schweitzer & Evan F. Risko - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (1):43-50.
Brain-Brain Integration in 2035: Metaphysical and Ethical Implications.Soraj Hongladarom - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):205-217.
Similar books and articles
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Egalitarian Justice Versus the Right to Privacy?Richard Arneson - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):91.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
Added to index2010-02-06
Total downloads43 ( #120,636 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,166 of 2,168,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?