Neuroethics 3 (1):5-12 (2010)

Authors
Juha Räikkä
University of Turku
Abstract
I will argue that the fairly common assumption that brain imaging may compromise people’s privacy in an undesirable way only if moral crimes are committed is false. Sometimes persons’ privacy is compromised because of failures of privacy. A normal emotional reaction to failures of privacy is embarrassment and shame, not moral resentment like in the cases of violations of right to privacy. I will claim that if (1) neuroimaging will provide all kinds of information about persons’ inner life and not only information that is intentionally searched for, and (2) there will be more and more application fields of fMRI and more and more people whose brains will be scanned (without any coercion), then, in the future, shame may be an unfortunately common feeling in our culture. This is because failures of privacy may dramatically increase. A person may feel shame strongly and long, especially if his failure is witnessed by people who he considers relatively important, but less than perfectly trustworthy.
Keywords Privacy  Brain imaging  Shame
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-010-9057-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,949
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - Dover Publications.
Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century.Neil Levy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Shame and Necessity.Bernard Williams - 1992 - University of California Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Brain-Brain Integration in 2035: Metaphysical and Ethical Implications.Soraj Hongladarom - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):205-217.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Privacy and Control.Scott A. Davison - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):137-151.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
The Journalist and Privacy.Louis Hodges - 1994 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):197 – 212.
Is There a Right to Privacy?Steven Davis - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-02-06

Total views
56 ( #177,943 of 2,409,814 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,271 of 2,409,814 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes