David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):410–418 (2003)
Against Schmidt-Petri's claim, I argue that John Stuart Mill is committed to the view that one pleasure is higher in quality than another if and only if at least a majority of those people who are competently acquainted with both always prefer the one no matter how much of the other is offered. I support my reading with solid textual evidence; none such is provided by Schmidt-Petri in support of his contrary interpretation that qualitative superiority exists whenever the experienced prefer less of one pleasure to more of another. The decisive objection to this is its incompatibility with the hedonistic requirement that more pleasure ought to be preferred to less, a requirement so fundamental that it would be uncharitable to suppose that Mill lost sight of it in his doctrine of higher pleasures
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jonathan Riley (1993). On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure. Utilitas 5 (2):291.
John Skorupski (2000). Quality of Well-Being: Quality of Being. In Roger Crisp & Brad Hooker (eds.), Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin. Clarendon Press. pp. 239--262.
Citations of this work BETA
Kristin Schaupp (2013). Books Before Chocolate? The Insufficiency of Mill's Evidence for Higher Pleasures. Utilitas 25 (2):266-276.
Michael Hauskeller (2011). No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures. Utilitas 23 (04):428-446.
Similar books and articles
Henry R. West (1976). Mill's Qualitative Hedonism. Philosophy 51 (195):97 - 101.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Six Theses About Pleasure. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):247-267.
Elliot David Cohen (1980). J. S. Mill's Qualitative Hedonism: A Textual Analysis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):151-158.
Guy Fletcher (2008). 'Mill, Moore, and Intrinsic Value'. Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):517-32.
Ki Su Kim (1988). Moral Rules and J. S. Mill's Educational Mandate. Journal of Moral Education 17 (2):105-113.
Steven D. Hales (2007). Mill V. Miller, or Higher and Lower Pleasures. In Steven Hales (ed.), Beer & Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Dale Dorsey (2010). Hutcheson's Deceptive Hedonism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):445-467.
Christoph Schmidt-Petri (2006). On an Interpretation of Mill's Qualitative Utilitarianism. Prolegomena 5 (2):165-177.
Jonathan Riley (2008). What Are Millian Qualitative Superiorities? Prolegomena 7 (1):61-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #80,105 of 1,925,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #308,518 of 1,925,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?