Utilitas 17 (2):147-179 (2005)

Authors
Jonathan Riley
Tulane University
Abstract
Mill's free speech doctrine is distinct from, yet compatible with, his central principle of ‘purely self-regarding’ liberty. Using the crucial analogy with trade, I claim that he defends a broad laissez-faire policy for expression, even though expression is ‘social’ or other-regarding conduct and thus legitimately subject to social regulation. An expedient laissez-faire policy admits of exceptions because speakers can sometimes cause such severe damage to others that coercive interference with the speech is justified. In those relatively few contexts where interference is called for, however, the central principle of self-regarding liberty sets absolute limits to the scope of society's regulatory authority. Regulation can never amount to an outright ban of any type of expression that can be consumed by the individual without direct and immediate harm to others. Nevertheless, and perhaps surprisingly, the central liberty principle admits censorship of certain extraordinary types of expression which necessarily harm others.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820805001500
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,089
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: A Millian Response.Alexander Brown - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):1-24.
The Tacit Concept of Competence in J. S. Mill's On Liberty.Thomas Nys - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):305-328.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom of Expression in Commerce.Kenton F. Machina - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II).D. H. Monro - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):238 – 253.
Mill on Liberty.Ted Honderich - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
Was Mill a Liberal?Chin-Liew Ten - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I).H. J. McCloskey - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):219 – 237.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
179 ( #56,904 of 2,440,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,747 of 2,440,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes