No Exception for Belief

Authors
Susanna Rinard
Harvard University
Abstract
This paper defends a principle I call Equal Treatment, according to which the rationality of a belief is determined in precisely the same way as the rationality of any other state. For example, if wearing a raincoat is rational just in case doing so maximizes expected value, then believing some proposition P is rational just in case doing so maximizes expected value. This contrasts with the popular view that the rationality of belief is determined by evidential support. It also contrasts with the common idea that in the case of belief, there are two different incommensurable senses of rationality, one of which is distinctively epistemic. I present considerations that favor Equal Treatment over these two alternatives, reply to objections, and criticize some arguments for Evidentialism. I also show how Equal Treatment opens the door to a distinctive kind of response to skepticism.
Keywords Ethics of Belief  Pragmatism  Pragmatic Reasons for Belief  Rationality  Epistemic Rationality  Doxastic Involuntarism  Evidentialism  Practical Rationality  Skepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phpr.12229
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Problems of the Self.Bernard A. O. Williams - 1973 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rational Endorsement.Will Fleisher - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2649-2675.
Belief in a Fallen World.Robert Pasnau - 2018 - Res Philosophica 95 (3):531-559.
Justifying the Principle of Indifference.Jon Williamson - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):559-586.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evidence and Normativity: Reply to Leite.Thomas Kelly - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):465–474.
Leaps of Knowledge.Andrew Reisner - 2013 - In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-183.
Reasons and Theoretical Rationality.Clayton Littlejohn - forthcoming - In Daniel Star (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press.
Putting Particularism in its Place.Joshua Gert - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):312-324.
Evidentialism and Pragmatic Constraints on Outright Belief.Dorit Ganson - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (3):441 - 458.
The Illusion of Discretion.Kurt Sylvan - 2015 - Synthese 193 (6):1635-1665.
The Rationality of Religious Belief in a Postmodern Age.Thomas Anthony Provenzola - 2000 - Dissertation, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.Thomas Kelly - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):612–640.
Stakes, Withholding, and Pragmatic Encroachment on Knowledge.Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):265 - 285.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-06-25

Total downloads
1,462 ( #712 of 2,273,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
242 ( #1,009 of 2,273,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature