Philosophy Research Archives, No. NO 1485:111-168 (1982)
When Wittgenstein said psychology contains conceptual confusions and experimental results, one item he had in mind was the psycho-physiological theory of kinaesthesis, which offers an account of how we know limb movement and position. The aim of this essay is to develop and evaluate the objections to that theory which have been produced by Wittgenstein, Melden and Anscombe. That project involves specifying clearly what is involved in the theory, resolving various disagreements between the critics, showing the pattern of the objections, and lastly evaluating the success of the case against the theory. That case amounts to the thesis that the kinaesthetic sensations we do have simply are not adequate to the evidential burden placed on them by the theory. Unless one thinks that they must constitute such evidence (the piece of conceptual confusion) no one would have thought that they do so
|Keywords||Commentary Epistemology Psychology Theory Wittgenstein|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Confusion of Sensations and Their Physical Correlates.Richard M. Warren - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):51-51.
The Influence of Einstein on Wittgenstein's Philosophy.Carlo Penco - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):360-379.
Folk Psychology and the Explanation of Human Behavior.Paul M. Churchland - 1988 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 62:209-21.
Testing Wittgenstein's Dismissal of Experimental Psychology Against Examples.Stewart Candlish - manuscript
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #331,377 of 2,164,598 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,391 of 2,164,598 )
How can I increase my downloads?