The division of responsibility and the law of tort

Abstract
In A Theory of Justice, Rawls makes almost no mention of the issues of justice that animated philosophers in earlier centuries. There is no discussion of justice between persons, issues that Aristotle sought to explain under the idea of “corrective justice.” Nor is there discussion, except in passing, of punishment, another primary focus of the social contract approaches of Locke, Rousseau and Kant.1 My aim in this article is to argue that implicit in Rawls’s writing is a powerful and persuasive account of the normative significance of tort law and corrective justice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Contract Law as Fairness.Josse Klijnsma - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (1):68-88.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
72 ( #74,963 of 2,191,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #291,146 of 2,191,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature