Using instruments to understand argument structure: Evidence for gradient representation

Cognition 142 (C):266-290 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenological Argumentative Structure.Gilbert Plumer - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):173-189.
Whither structured representation?Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):626-627.
Scientific Evidence: Creating and Evaluating Experimental Instruments and Research Techniques.William Bechtel - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:559 - 572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-10

Downloads
33 (#498,801)

6 months
11 (#271,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The logical form of action sentences.Donald Davidson - 1967 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 81--95.
Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics.Manfred Krifka - 1989 - In Renate Bartsch, J. F. A. K. van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression. Foris Publications. pp. 75--115.
Are linguists better subjects?Jennifer Culbertson & Steven Gross - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):721-736.
On events in linguistic semantics.James Higginbotham - 2000 - In James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi & Achille Varzi (eds.), Speaking of Events. Oxford University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references