What equality of opportunity could not be

Ethics 112 (4):720-747 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This study is concerned with john R0emer’s Equality of Opportunity} I argue that his theory is committed to compatibilism but that one of its central claims is plausible only within a libertarian view on the free-will problem. Thus Roemer’s theory is troubled by a deep structural inco— herence and should be rejected as an account of equality of opportunity? Let me briefly introduce some background to Roemer’s theory. Contemporary egalitarians face two major challenges: first, they need..



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The value in equal opportunity: Reply to Kershnar.John O'dea - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):177–187.
Equality of opportunity and affirmative action.Ovadia Ezra - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):22-37.
Equality of opportunity for welfare defended and recanted.Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (4):488–497.


Added to PP

150 (#85,538)

6 months
1 (#450,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mathias Risse
Harvard University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references