Justificationist social epistemology and critical thinking

Educational Theory 61 (5):565-585 (2011)
Abstract
In this essay Juho Ritola develops a justificationist approach to social epistemology, which holds that normatively satisfactory social processes pertaining to the acquisition, storage, dissemination, and use of knowledge must be evidence-based processes that include appropriate reflective attitudes by the relevant agents and, consequently, the relevant institutions. This implies that the teaching of critical thinking and reasoning in general should strive to bring about such attitudes in students. Ritola begins by sketching a justificationist approach and defending it on a general level against the criticism posed by Alvin Goldman. He then defends it on the level of individual reasoners against the argument set out by Michael Bishop and J.D. Trout. Based on empirical evidence, Bishop and Trout argue that the kind of reflection advocated by a justificationist approach to reasoning leads to worse outcomes than the use of various statistical prediction rules. Ritola, in contrast, maintains that one cannot and should not replace critical reflection on evidence by a mechanical application of rules. Instead, he asserts, statistical prediction rules and empirical evidence regarding our reasoning performance are part of the total evidence that we should reflect on in our critical reasoning
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00421.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,840
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Critical Thinking is Epistemically Responsible.Juho Ritola - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):659-678.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Critical Thinking is Epistemically Responsible.Juho Ritola - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):659-678.
Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.
Nurturing the Relational Promise of Critical Thinking.M. Neil Browne & Michelle Crosby - 2004 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):23-26.
Truth, Thinking, Testimony and Trust: Alvin Goldman on Epistemology and Education.Harvey Siegel - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):345–366.
The Relationship of Critical Thinking to Success in College.Robert L. Williams & Stephen L. Worth - 2001 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):5-16.
The Vocabulary of Critical Thinking.Phil Washburn - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
A Justificationist View of Disagreement's Epistemic Significance.Jennifer Lackey - 2008 - In Alan Millar Adrian Haddock & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 145-154.
Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):464-479.
Critical Thinking.Robert Ennis - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):4-18.
Critical Reasoning, Understanding and Self-Knowledge.J. Brown - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):659-676.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-21

Total downloads

17 ( #286,848 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums