Komparative aussagemuster in bezug zu komplementären und enkaptischen modellen der morphologie

Acta Biotheoretica 30 (1):49-66 (1981)
The unity of organisms can be viewed in terms of the concepts of enkapsis and complementarity. A model (or a type) represents those properties (of elements, structure, and system) which renders cases - the organisms under consideration — comparable. Comparability is established by operations (or metamorphoses) which relate a case to a model. Therefore, the model and the operations must be enumerated together, if a certain morphology is to be established and applied. Two models, which in some way are related, are conjunct, otherwise they are disjunct. If one model is deducible from the other, they are enkaptic conjunct. If the models are essentially different, that is to say that they cannot be transduced into each other, although they condition each other, they are complementary conjunct: although not comparable themselves, only both together describe a case (or a set of cases) completely. Now, the comparability of a case with two models is considered. The two basic patterns of general comparability are homology and analogy. If the two models are complementary conjunct, nine patterns of special comparability can be distinguished. Each is named in accordance with the general meaning of homology and analogy and, as far as possible, with conventional scientific usage. With minor modifications the terminology also applies to more complicated patterns of comparability including distinct or different conjunct models.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00116072
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How Scientific Models Can Explain.Alisa Bokulich - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
What’s so Special About Model Organisms?Sabina Leonelli & Rachel Ankeny - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):313-323.
Models.Jeffrey Koperski - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
9 ( #471,492 of 2,191,918 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,918 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature