Conceptual Role Semantics and Rationality

Acta Analytica 33 (2):271-289 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptual role semanticists argue that concepts are individuated in terms of their roles in cognition. Some prominent conceptual role semanticists argue for the further claim that concepts are individuated in terms of their rational roles in cognition. This further claim places substantive normative constraints on concept-constitutive roles. I argue that conceptual role semanticists can and should resist the claim that conceptual roles must be specified in inherently normative terms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-27

Downloads
117 (#182,513)

6 months
9 (#454,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bradley Rives
Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 47 references / Add more references