Generation, interiority and the phenomenology of Christianity in Michel Henry

Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2):205-235 (2011)

In this paper I focus on a central phenomenological concept in Michel Henry’s work that has often been neglected: generation. Generation becomes an especially important conceptual key to understanding not only the relationship between God and human self but also Henry’s adoption of radical interiority and his critical standpoint with respect to much of the phenomenological tradition in which he is working. Thus in pursuing the theme of generation, I shall introduce many phenomenological-theological terms in Henry’s trilogy on Christianity as well as how he understands the relationship between phenomenology and theology. In the final sections of the paper, I turn to positively defining Henry’s notion of divine generation and examine the theological implications of it in light of his confrontation and rejection of the doctrine of creation in the book of Genesis found in his book, Incarnation: une philosophie de la chair. Humans are not created but are eternally generated, a bold claim that brings Henry to the brink of a kind of interiorized pantheism or Gnostic dualism. Finally, I offer some critical comments specifically about Henry’s doctrine of generation in light of the tension between auto-affection and hetero-affection and thus how one might think after Henry in light of the basic Augustinian theological distinction between self and God and the intentionality of faith opened up by that distinction
Keywords Phenomenology  Generation  Interiority  Flesh  Auto-affection  Hetero-affection  Monism and faith
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-011-9176-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant & Norman Kemp Smith - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
58 ( #144,277 of 2,271,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #332,631 of 2,271,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature