Monash Bioethics Review 28 (1):04-1 (2009)

Authors
Steve Clarke
Charles Sturt University
Abstract
We consider the current debate between bioconservatives and their chief opponents — whom we dub bioliberals — about the moral acceptability of human enhancement and the policy implications of moral debates about enhancement. We argue that this debate has reached an impasse, largely because bioconservatives hold that we should honour intuitions about the special value of being human, even if we cannot identify reasons to ground those intuitions. We argue that although intuitions are often a reliable guide to belief and action, there are circumstances in which they are not reliable. Intuitions — including intuitions about enhancement — are subject to various cognitive biases rendering them unreliable in some circumstances. We argue that many bioconservative intuitions about enhancement are examples of such unreliable intuitions. Given this, it is unrealistic of bioconservatives to expect others to rely on their unexamined intuitions. Furthermore, refusing to engage in debates about the reasons and values that underpin their intuitions about enhancement will have the effect of making bioconservative voices less relevant in policy debates about enhancement than they would otherwise be.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/bf03351306
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,147
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):233-243.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bioconservatism, Bioliberalism, and Repugnance.Rebecca Roache & Steve Clarke - 2009 - Monash Bioethics Review 28 (1):04.1-04.21.
Misconceptions Concerning Wisdom.Nicholas Maxwell - 2013 - Journal of Modern Wisdom 2:92-97.
“Two Types of Wisdom”.Jason Baehr - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (2):81-97.
Teaching for Wisdom.Andrew Targowski - 2012 - Dialogue and Universalism 22 (3):93-114.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-14

Total views
40 ( #234,542 of 2,324,606 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #91,028 of 2,324,606 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes