Philosophical Quarterly 50 (195):231-238 (1999)
I discuss theories about the way in which we determine the precedence ofperceived events. I examine Mellor’s account, which claims that it is thetiming of our perceptions of events that enables us to determine their order,and Dennett’s criticism of this. Dennett cites psychological experimentswhich suggest that it is the content of our perceptions, rather than theirtiming, which allows us to determine the order of the events perceived. Iargue that by distinguishing between two different ways of construing‘perception’ we can see not only that the two accounts are compatible, but that Dennett’s account presupposes Mellor’s
|Keywords||Epistemology Perception Reality Time Dennett, D Mellor, D H|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Prior-Entry: A Review.Charles Spence & Cesare Parise - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):364-379.
Kant and the Conventionality of Simultaneity.Adrian Bardon - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):845-856.
Similar books and articles
Transcendental Tense.D. H. Mellor - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):29 - 56.
Consciousness Explained?: A Commentary on Dennett's Consciousness Explained.Sam S. Rakover - 1994 - International Studies in Philosophy 26 (2):97-99.
Subjective Facts.Tim Crane - 2003 - In Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of D. H. Mellor. New York: Routledge.
Qualia or Non Epistemic Perception: D. Dennett's and F. Dretske's Representational Theories of Consciousness.Sofia Miguens - 2002 - Agora 21 (2):193-208.
Transcendental Tense: D.H. Mellor.D. H. Mellor - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):29–44.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #129,493 of 2,154,175 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,120 of 2,154,175 )
How can I increase my downloads?