A Class of Simpler Logical Matrices for the Variable-Sharing Property

Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):241-249 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In our paper “A general characterization of the variable-sharing property by means of logical matrices”, a general class of so-called “Relevant logical matrices”, RMLs, is defined. The aim of this paper is to define a class of simpler Relevant logical matrices RMLs′serving the same purpose that RMLs, to wit: any logic verified by an RML′has the variable-sharing property and related properties predicable of the logic of entailment E and of the logic of relevance R

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,985

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reduced products of logical matrices.Janusz Czelakowski - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):19 - 43.
On reduced matrices.Wolfgang Rautenberg - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (1):63 - 72.
The k-variable property is stronger than h-dimension K.Ian Hodkinson & András Simon - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):81-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
19 (#596,692)

6 months
1 (#485,467)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

José M. Méndez
Universidad de Salamanca
Gemma Robles
Universidad de León

Citations of this work

Strong Depth Relevance.Shay Allen Logan - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Logic 18 (6):645-656.
What is a Relevant Connective?Shawn Standefer - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):919-950.
Admissibility of Ackermann's rule δ in relevant logics.Gemma Robles - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (4):411-427.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The compatibility of relevance and Mingle.José M. Méndez - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (3):279 - 297.
Erratum to: The compatibility of relevance and Mingle. [REVIEW]José M. Méndez - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3):339-339.

Add more references