Anderson's deontic logic and relevant implication

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):145-154 (1981)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093883399
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Relevant Implication and the Case for a Weaker Logic.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183.
Semantics for Analytic Containment.Fabrice Correia - 2004 - Studia Logica 77 (1):87-104.
Relevant Predication: Grammatical Characterisations. [REVIEW]Philip Kremer - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):349 - 382.
Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic.Jaakko Hintikka - 1971 - In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Sold and Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston. pp. 59-104.
Defining Relevant Implication in a Propositionally Quantified S.Philip Kremer - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
On Deontic Logic.Leon Gumański - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):63 - 75.
Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total downloads
2 ( #789,280 of 2,191,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,023 of 2,191,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature