Analogical reminding and the storage of experience: the paradox of Hofstadter-Sander

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (3):355-385 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their exhaustive study of the cognitive operation of analogy, Hofstadter and Sander arrive at a paradox: the creative and inexhaustible production of analogies in our thought must derive from a “reminding” operation based upon the availability of the detailed totality of our experience. Yet the authors see no way that our experience can be stored in the brain in such detail nor do they see how such detail could be accessed or retrieved such that the innumerable analogical remindings we experience can occur. Analogy creation, then, should not be possible. The intent here is to sharpen and deepen our understanding of the paradox, emphasizing its criticality. It will be shown that the retrieval problem has its origins in the failure of memory theory to recognize the actual dynamic structure of events. This structure is comprised of invariance laws as per J. J. Gibson, and this event “invariance structure” is exactly what supports Hofstadter and Sander’s missing mechanism for analogical reminding. Yet these structures of invariants, existing only over optical flows, auditory flows, haptic flows, etc., are equally difficult to imagine being stored in a static memory, and thus only exacerbate the problem of the storage of experience in the brain. A possible route to the solution of this dilemma, based in the radical model of Bergson, is also sketched.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bergson, perception and Gibson.Stephen E. Robbins - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (5):23-45.
Semantics, experience and time.Stephen E. Robbins - 2002 - Cognitive Systems Research 3 (3):301-337.
Experience, Memory and Intelligence.John T. Sanders - 1985 - The Monist 68 (4):507-521.
Analogical inferences are central to analogy.Arthur B. Markman & Jeffrey P. Laux - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):390-391.
Reminding and retrieval from permanent storage.Herman Buschke, Philip C. Goldberg & Gerald Lazar - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):132.
Bergson on the Paradox of the Human Conditionq.Demet Kurtoğlu Taşdelen - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:67-72.
Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments.J. E. Adler - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.
Situation semantics and models of analogy.David H. Helman - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (2):231 - 244.
What memory is.Stan Klein - 2015 - WIREs Cognitive Science 6 (1):1-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-05

Downloads
35 (#396,067)

6 months
7 (#176,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The Predictive Mind.Jakob Hohwy - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
The Perception Of The Visual World.James J. Gibson - 1950 - Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Marc H. Bornstein - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):203-206.

View all 45 references / Add more references