Biocentric Consequentialism, Pluralism, and 'The Minimax Implication': A Reply to Alan Carter

Utilitas 15 (1):76 (2003)
Abstract
Alan Carter's recent review in Mind of my Ethics of the Global Environment combines praise of biocentric consequentialism with criticisms that it could advocate both minimal satisfaction of human needs and the extinction of for the sake of generating extra people; Carter also maintains that as a monistic theory it is predictably inadequate to cover the full range of ethical issues, since only a pluralistic theory has this capacity. In this reply, I explain how the counter-intuitive implications of biocentric consequentialism suggested by Carter are not implications, and argue that since pluralistic theories either generate contradictions or collapse into monistic theories, the superiority of pluralistic theories is far from predictable. Thus Carter's criticisms fail to undermine biocentric consequentialism as a normative theory applicable to the generality of ethical issues
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800003782
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
From Biocentric Individualism to Biocentric Pluralism.James P. Sterba - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):191-207.
In Defense of Biocentrism.Paul W. Taylor - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):237-243.
Exploitation and Workers'Co-Operatives: A Reply to Alan Carter.John O'neill - 1991 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (2):231-235.
The Shape of a Global Ethic.Robin Attfield - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):5-19.
The Prospects of a Viable Biocentric Egalitarianism.Karánn Durland - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (4):401-416.
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.
Reverence for Life as a Viable Environmental Virtue.Jason Kawall - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (4):339-358.
On Behalf of Biocentric Individualism.Jason Kawall - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (1):69-88.
Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total downloads
61 ( #87,496 of 2,180,039 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #51,450 of 2,180,039 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums