Authors
Ingrid Robeyns
Utrecht University
Abstract
This paper offers a critique of Martha Nussbaum’s description of the capability approach, and offers an alternative. I will argue that Nussbaum’s characterization of the capability approach is flawed, in two ways. First, she unduly limits the capability to two strands of work, thereby ignoring important other capabilitarian scholarship. Second, she argues that there are five essential elements that all capability theories meet; yet upon closer analysis three of them are not really essential to the capability approach. I also offer an alternative description of the capability approach, which is called the cartwheel view of the capability approach. This view is at the same time radically multidisciplinary yet also contains a foundationally robust core among its various usages, and is therefore much better able to make the case that the capability approach can be developed in a very wide range of more specific normative theories. Finally, the cartwheel view is used to argue against Nussbaum's claim that all capabilitarian political theory needs to be politically liberal.
Keywords capability approach  capabilities approach  Martha Nussbaum  Amartya Sen
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is the Point of Equality?Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (1):3-45.
Perfectionism and Politics.Richard J. Arneson - 2000 - Ethics 111 (1):37-63.
The Capability Approach.Ingrid Robeyns - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50:92-93.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Capabilities-Based Account of Wellbeing.Peter Koch - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (3):85-87.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why the Capability Approach is Justified.Sandrine Berges - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):16–25.
Capability Egalitarianism and Moral Selfhood.John M. Alexander - 2003 - Ethical Perspectives 10 (1):3-21.
Poverty and Freedom.Gottfried Schweiger & Gunter Graf - 2014 - Human Affairs 24 (2):258-268.
A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue.Jay Drydyk - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):23-38.
Rights, Goals, and Capabilities.Martin van Hees - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):247-259.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-08-10

Total views
216 ( #40,047 of 2,385,741 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #27,896 of 2,385,741 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes