In order to provide a positive defence of utilitarianism, R.M Hare presented his own theory of 'two-level' utilitarianism, claiming that it overcame the main objections directed towards traditional act utilitarianism. This essay firstly outlines the main problems associated with utilitarianism and examines whether Hare's theory is indeed able to successfully overcome them. It then goes on to examine the coherence of two-level utilitarianism itself, and thus determine whether it can provide a positive defence of utilitarianism by being an example of a successful and practical utilitarian theory. I conclude that two-level utilitarianism does successfully avoid the difficulties associated with act-utilitarianism, but only providing that we can find a way to overcome the psychological demands of two-level theory that requires us to maintain and practice two distinct types of moral thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #173,476 of 2,439,394 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #136,786 of 2,439,394 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes