Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):54-55 (1999)
| Abstract |
We discuss our concerns associated with three assumptions upon which the model of Levelt, Roelofs & Meyer is based: assumed generalisability of decontextualised experimental programs, assumed highly modular architecture of the language production systems, and assumed symbolic computations within the language production system. We suggest that these assumptions are problematic and require further justification
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0140525X99381772 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sidestepping the Semantics of “Consciousness”.Michael V. Antony - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):289-290.
Similar books and articles
The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments.Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics.Robert Batterman - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
Mediation Theory and the Problem of Psychological Discourse on 'Inner' Events: Part II.Gottfried Seebaß - unknown
Binding, Attention, and Exchanges.Gary S. Dell, Victor S. Ferreira & Kathryn Bock - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):41-42.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
10 ( #899,635 of 2,506,349 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,349 )
2009-01-28
Total views
10 ( #899,635 of 2,506,349 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,349 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
