Throughout all of Deleuze’s work one finds an extended encounter with the Event of Difference. Deleuze’s extraordinary work on Leibniz is no exception. In the ‘later’ work, and regarding Leibniz, Deleuze remarks, “no philosophy has ever pushed to such an extreme the affirmations of one and the same world, and of an infinite difference and variety in this world”. This positive identification with Leibniz is not found in the ‘earlier’ wave of Deleuzian texts from the sixties where Leibniz is captured hesitating over the possible and the virtual. Any such hesitation over the possible and the virtual is “disastrous” for a philosophy of the event and difference since it abolishes the reality of the virtual and subordinates it to the identical, replacing pure immanence with a ‘theological model’ of creation. Is the Leibniz of Deleuze’s early texts compossible with the later? What is the significance of the event of difference or fold that joins and separates Deleuze’s continuing encounter with Leibniz? We will examine what is at stake in these differing understandings of Leibniz to Deleuze’s philosophy of events of difference
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Continental Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1085-1968
DOI 10.5840/epoche2003814
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics.Mogens Lærke - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Question of Deleuze’s Neo-Leibnizianism.Simon B. Duffy - 2012 - In Patricia Pisters & Rosi Braidotti (eds.), Down by Law: Revisiting Normativity with Deleuze. Bloomsbury Academic.
A Criminal Intrigue: An Interview with Jean-Clet Martin.Constantin V. Boundas - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (Suppl):116-147.
The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze.Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (eds.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Differentiating Derrida and Deleuze.Gordon C. F. Bearn - 2000 - Continental Philosophy Review 33 (4):441-465.
Deleuze’s Difference.Matthew S. Linck - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (4):509 – 532.
Schizo‐Math.Simon Duffy - 2004 - Angelaki 9 (3):199 – 215.


Added to PP index

Total views
58 ( #177,705 of 59,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #293,757 of 59,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes