Philosophy of Science 86 (3):551-576 (2019)

Authors
Michael O'Rourke
Michigan State University
Brian Robinson
Texas A&M University - Kingsville
Chad Gonnerman
University of Southern Indiana
Abstract
This paper contributes to the underdeveloped field of experimental philosophy of science. We examine variability in the philosophical views of scientists. Using data from Toolbox Dialogue Initiative, we analyze scientists’ responses to prompts on philosophical issues (methodology, confirmation, values, reality, reductionism, and motivation for scientific research) to assess variance in the philosophical views of physical scientists, life scientists, and social and behavioral scientists. We find six prompts about which differences arose, with several more that look promising for future research. We then evaluate the difference between the natural and social sciences and the challenge of interdisciplinary integration across scientific branches.
Keywords Experimental philosophy  philosophy of science  integration  interdisciplinarity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Experimental Biology.Marcel Weber - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy in the Trenches: From Naturalized to Experimental Philosophy (of Science).Karola Stotz - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):225-226.
Interdisciplinarity in Action: Philosophy of Science Perspectives.Uskali Mäki & Miles MacLeod - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (3):323-326.
Philosophy of Experimental Biology.Janet D. Stemwedel - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (1):139-141.
Berkeley, Epistemology, and Science.Warren E. Steinkraus - 1984 - Idealistic Studies 14 (3):183-192.
Philosophy and the Brain Sciences.Peter Machamer & Justin Sytsma - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (2):353-374.
Thought Experiments in Experimental Philosophy.Kirk Ludwig - 2016 - In Mike Stuart, James Robert Brown & Yiftach J. H. Fehige (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. New York: Routledge. pp. 385-405.
Integration in Biology: Philosophical Perspectives on the Dynamics of Interdisciplinarity.Ingo Brigandt - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):461-465.
Astronomy and Experimentation.Michelle Sandell - 2010 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14 (3):252-269.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-20

Total views
33 ( #327,105 of 2,445,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #185,500 of 2,445,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes