Generalizing the Depth Relevance Condition: Deep Relevant Logics Not Included in R-Mingle

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (1):107-127 (2014)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/00294527-1960461
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Where Gamma Fails.Robert K. Meyer, Steve Giambrone & Ross T. Brady - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (3):247 - 256.
Relational Proof System for Relevant Logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Depth Relevance of Some Paraconsistent Logics.Ross T. Brady - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):63 - 73.
Relevant Predication: Grammatical Characterisations. [REVIEW]Philip Kremer - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):349 - 382.
Duality for Algebras of Relevant Logics.Alasdair Urquhart - 1996 - Studia Logica 56 (1-2):263 - 276.
Substructural Logics with Mingle.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):227-249.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2013-06-23

Total downloads

5 ( #595,594 of 2,163,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums